Rush to Judgment.
(eVideo)
Contributors
de Antonio, Emile, film director.
Lane, Mark, actor.
Films We Like (Firm), Distributor
Kanopy (Firm), Distributor
Lane, Mark, actor.
Films We Like (Firm), Distributor
Kanopy (Firm), Distributor
Published
[San Francisco, California, USA] : Films We Like, 1967., Kanopy Streaming, 2024.
Physical Desc
1 online resource (streaming video file) (125 minutes): digital, .flv file, sound
Status
More Details
Format
eVideo
Language
English
Notes
General Note
Title from title frames.
General Note
Film
General Note
In Process Record.
Participants/Performers
Mark Lane
Date/Time and Place of Event
Originally produced by Films We Like in 1967.
Description
In 1966, the documentary RUSH TO JUDGMENT presented for the first time a simple, concise legal argument that the Warren Commission was hiding something, suggesting a broader conspiracy. Lee Harvey Oswald could not have single-handedly killed President John F. Kennedy. Director Emile de Antonio and lawyer Mark Lane recorded unpolished, first-hand interviews from witnesses with direct proximity to the murders–but who were not given a platform in the official inquiry. For a subject that has been rehashed and sensationalized so many times in the intervening 60 years, this documentary brings fresh clarity and presents a cool-headed argument that is untouched by time.
System Details
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Description
Loading Description...
Citations
APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)
de Antonio, E., & Lane, M. (1967). Rush to Judgment . Films We Like.
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)de Antonio, Emile and Mark, Lane. 1967. Rush to Judgment. Films We Like.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)de Antonio, Emile and Mark, Lane. Rush to Judgment Films We Like, 1967.
MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)de Antonio, Emile,, and Mark Lane. Rush to Judgment Films We Like, 1967.
Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.
Staff View
Grouped Work ID
0204099b-1865-33c2-5ae9-d06972306829-eng
Grouping Information
| Grouped Work ID | 0204099b-1865-33c2-5ae9-d06972306829-eng |
|---|---|
| Full title | rush to judgment |
| Author | films we like |
| Grouping Category | movie |
| Last Update | 2024-04-01 13:09:47PM |
| Last Indexed | 2024-06-07 20:08:48PM |
Book Cover Information
| Image Source | sideload |
|---|---|
| First Loaded | May 10, 2024 |
| Last Used | May 10, 2024 |
Marc Record
| First Detected | Mar 13, 2024 04:22:01 PM |
|---|---|
| Last File Modification Time | Mar 13, 2024 04:22:01 PM |
MARC Record
| LEADER | 02289ngm a2200493 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | kan14597180 | ||
| 003 | CaSfKAN | ||
| 005 | 20240301105631.0 | ||
| 006 | m o c | ||
| 007 | cr una---unuuu | ||
| 007 | vz uzazuu | ||
| 008 | 240301p20241967cau124 o vleng d | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a 14597180|b Kanopy |
| 040 | |a CaSfKAN|b eng|e rda|c CaSfKAN | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Rush to Judgment. |
| 264 | 1 | |b Films We Like,|c 1967. | |
| 264 | 1 | |a [San Francisco, California, USA] :|b Kanopy Streaming,|c 2024. | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (streaming video file) (125 minutes):|b digital, .flv file, sound | ||
| 336 | |a two-dimensional moving image|b tdi|2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer|b c|2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource|b cr|2 rdacarrier | ||
| 344 | |a digital | ||
| 347 | |a video file|b MPEG-4|b Flash | ||
| 500 | |a Title from title frames. | ||
| 500 | |a Film | ||
| 500 | |a In Process Record. | ||
| 511 | 0 | |a Mark Lane | |
| 518 | |a Originally produced by Films We Like in 1967. | ||
| 520 | |a In 1966, the documentary RUSH TO JUDGMENT presented for the first time a simple, concise legal argument that the Warren Commission was hiding something, suggesting a broader conspiracy. Lee Harvey Oswald could not have single-handedly killed President John F. Kennedy. Director Emile de Antonio and lawyer Mark Lane recorded unpolished, first-hand interviews from witnesses with direct proximity to the murders–but who were not given a platform in the official inquiry. For a subject that has been rehashed and sensationalized so many times in the intervening 60 years, this documentary brings fresh clarity and presents a cool-headed argument that is untouched by time. | ||
| 538 | |a Mode of access: World Wide Web. | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Current affairs. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a History, Modern. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a History. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Americans. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Political science. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Documentary films. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Social sciences. | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Documentary films.|2 lcgft | |
| 700 | 1 | |a de Antonio, Emile,|e film director. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lane, Mark,|e actor. | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Films We Like (Firm),|4 dst | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Kanopy (Firm),|4 dst | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://cambridgema.kanopy.com/node/13597181|z A Kanopy streaming video |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |z Cover Image|u https://www.kanopy.com/node/13597181/external-image |
